Wednesday, August 22, 2012


So Paul Ryan is bold.

Really? Is it bold to champion the rich? Is it bold to bankrupt the country? What's bold about taking food stamps away from starving people who have lost their jobs? What's bold about decreasing benefits to Social Security? Is it bold to outspend all the other countries combined in war investment? Is it bold to restrict voting privileges? What have these guys done that deserves to be called bold? What?

I'll tell you who was bold. Ike. Ike was bold. Ike kept a tax on the rich that was 90%. Sounds harsh but here's what Ike knew. The rich can live like kings on 1% of what they take in. The rich hate paying taxes so much that they would rather give it away to charity or real business ventures than to give it to the government. So not only did the rich pay higher taxes under Ike, they also invested much more heavily in the organizations that most need the money.....small business start ups and charity. You wanna end this recession? Jack the rates up on the rich and never look back. Now that's bold!




Sunday, August 12, 2012


“I am not a Catholic,” I said.

I did not wait to see what he had to say. I was in a hurry to get the next part out of my mouth. “I also happen to believe that Jesus of Nazareth was one of the greatest men who ever lived and that Christians don't understand why he was great.” I braced myself, ready for the onslaught that would surely come next. But Father Joe just looked at me and smiled. My words did not seem to shock him.

Then he started to talk about the stars and his eyes lit up. He reminded me that it was a Catholic priest who proposed the big bang. We struggled together to remember the name. He thought that maybe it was a French priest. Actually, his name is George Lemaitre, a Belgian. But Father Joe didn't miss a beat. He pointed at the table as if it were a sandy beach and reminded me that there were as many stars in the heavens as grains of sand on all the beaches and deserts in the world. He remarked at how small the earth had looked to the astronauts. He could not hold back the glee as we shared our love for cosmology.

I touched on string theory and told him that I had once attempted to read Einstein but that it was too thick to get through. He seemed excited to share the wonders of science. We talked about the “god” particle recently discovered at Cern. This was not the way it was supposed to go. He was supposed to tell me I was going to hell.

He deftly shifted the conversation back to me and the purpose of his curiosity finally revealed itself. Father Breen had a burning desire to tell a story. He wanted to tell the story of the typical fallen Catholic. I was not sure why. There was nothing disingenuous about this man. It occurred to me that my journey was on a parallel track with his. We both genuinely sought a better understanding of God, the universe, the meaning of eternity.

Ever since I was a child, I knew deep down inside that adults lied to me about the most important things. Santa Claus was a lie. The stork was a whopper. Was Jesus a lie too? What was it like to be dead forever? Was heaven another lie? I was just a kid but these things bothered me. And every time I asked an adult, I was told not to worry about it, that Jesus would take me to heaven when I died and there was no future in questioning that. That too, seemed to be an easy lie. So I worked hard at my faith and swore to myself that Jesus was talking to me. But no matter how hard I tried, it just seemed like I was only talking, pretending that he was talking back.

I began to wonder if God would ever talk to me. I saw that all the great heroes of the Bible were men of great faith. I was told that if my faith was strong enough, God would speak to me. I believed that fervently. I believed it literally. But no matter how hard I prayed, no matter how good I tried to be, there was never a moment of the direct communication that I sought. Why would God hide from me?

Most people have no trouble deluding themselves into believing that God talks to them. It seems dishonest to me. Mark Twain once said that “faith is believing what you know ain't so.” If what you believe is not true, then all the faith in the world is sheer folly. Before you commit to believing in something, shouldn't you first resolve it's veracity? My value system has always been hard wired to truth. Faith must come secondary. Most people have a different hierarchy. They place faith above truth. Backwards!

So it's little wonder that I am a fallen Catholic. Much as I love the Catholic Church and the good that it has done, I am very angry at the leadership within the Church. The men who pretend to protect the truth are really undermining it. They charge theologians to seek out the truth, but when it comes to the public, they clamp down hard on the most salient details of our past. The evolution of the virgin birth and the convoluted history of the Bible are testaments to man's inability to eschew myth. The idea of infallibility is a transparent attempt to gloss over the obvious problems with Catholic theology. The whole idea of the Trinity is proof to me that Catholicism is overtly pagan. Trying to explain away the three in one idea as a mystery exposes a naked obfuscation. Believers keep coming back to the same dodge. They believe because they were given the gift of faith.

There's a scene in The Wizard of Oz that struck me when I was a teenager, watching it for the umpteenth time. The cowardly lion turns to Dorothy after the scarecrow has been dismembered by flying monkeys. He declares, “I do believe in spooks. I do believe in spooks. I do I do I do I do I do believe in spooks.” To this day, that line swirls around in my head every time I try to say The Apostles Creed.

Who's faith is based on a lie? Don't all religions claim to be the one truth? If Christianity is right, does that mean all the others are destined to hell? If God devised this test, he is clearly unaware of the cultural pressures placed on believers in other religions. Can God really be devious and aloof?

But the one thing that keeps me hovering around church is the radical idea of Jesus. I see Jesus as a fantastic anomaly. Here is a man who sees clearly how best to describe morality. But tied up within that irrefutable logic is a myth that seems horribly flawed. The God who tested Abraham by telling him to kill his son is arguably sadistic. The idea that all of us should suffer because Adam ate the forbidden fruit is patently unfair. God just doesn't pass the smell test when it comes to fairness. And the idea that God so loved the world that he gave up his son to be tortured for his own selfish lack of forgiveness is another damning fact. God ( Or should I say the Christian God?) does not seem to deserve immortality. He is mean; needlessly and arbitrarily mean.

So if I am right, what good is Catholicism? Why should I sit in a restaurant with a Catholic priest and wish him success in his efforts to win back my soul? The answer to that question is complicated. My wife is a staunch Catholic and I worship her. I try to attend Mass with her whenever possible so that she feels secure in her faith. I do not wish to destroy the one thing that keeps her going. Catholicism has been her salvation.

Last year she took on a job that was extremely difficult, working with people who took advantage of her. She was just not measuring up to their impossibly high standards. She knew she had to hang on to that job. Our finances were in a horrible mess and the pressure was enormous. I watched her in the mornings as we prepared for the day. She would always sit at the end of the couch and read her bible while I read the paper. One morning I looked over at her and tears were falling down on the pages of her precious book. It was the last straw. I urged her to quit the job and look for employment where she could be appreciated. I could not stand seeing her hurt so deeply by the insensitive bullies who exploited her.

Father Breen understood. He did not try to tell me that my ideas about God were wrong. He grasped at the positive instead. “So you believe Jesus was right?” he asked.

“He was right about life. He was wrong about death and God,” I said. Again, I expected Joe to scold me for judging Jesus. But he passed on the opportunity. He just nodded. I continued.

I believe that if Christians would follow the practical teachings of Jesus, the world would be transformed. But instead of giving up their pursuit of wealth they call themselves sinners and dismiss the whole idea of peace, love and truth. It's an easy out and one that most Christians are glad to abuse.
So the idea that most Christians are hypocrites permeates my philosophy. Jesus was a radical lefty peacenik. But conservatives have given him a capitalist makeover.

Father Breen did not seem disturbed by my declarations. In fact, he admitted that too many people miss the simple message Jesus was trying to impart. I cannot speak for Father Breen. I believe that he is far more accepting of other religions than his paternalistic hierarchy but he is also more conservative than he wants to admit, at least to me.

So much of what the Catholic Church has become is a direct result of the competition for souls. It is an unhealthy kind of salesmanship. That is why I have a visceral disdain for evangelicals. They prey on our fear of death and the devil. Their message crowds out the basic kindness and decency of Jesus.

Father Breen takes a less heavy handed, far more clever approach. He seems to be saying that everyone is welcome. He has a kind of big tent philosophy. Is it possible that Father Breen would give Communion to an atheist? Does he measure Catholicism by its ability to force conformity? Or is he willing to accept a more tolerant approach? Can Catholics learn from the division of Judaism? Should there be Orthodox Catholic, Conservative Catholic and Reform Catholic?

Why must Catholics exorcize the free thinkers? If liberals love the message of Jesus, shouldn't their ideas count? Can faith give way to truth without destroying God? Wasn't Jesus a radical? Isn't it possible that a freer discourse could bring about a theological renaissance? Why do conservatives always manage to grab the reins of power in just about every single major religion? Isn't their worship of conformity an impediment to progress? Isn't their desire for distinction anathema to the teachings of Jesus? Why is it so easy to find articles attacking liberals in any Catholic publication? Why aren't the opposing viewpoints given space?

The answers to those questions are the key to saving Catholicism and Christianity from its abysmal decline. In fact, maybe my own salvation and that of the arch-typical fallen Catholic depends upon the reformation of Catholicism itself. Vatican II was a huge step in the right direction. But the leadership and their 40 year anti-Vatican backlash must take responsibility for their disastrous purge. And the fight for a more universal Catholicism must be joined.

After my meeting with Father Breen, I had a very strange dream. The Pope was standing at the front door of the cathedral pushing people away. His staff turned into a machine gun that he waved menacingly at the crowd. Around the back of the church, at a side door, Father Breen was sneaking people back into the church. To some, that is a disturbing nightmare. To me, it is a very good omen.

Ultimately, the question of my salvation is a double edged sword. I think, with the help of Father Breen, I might be saved. But the more important question is this: Can any truth seeker be saved without first exposing the truth about Catholicism?

What would Jesus do? Indeed.   

Saturday, August 4, 2012

The real cost of nuclear power is the subject of this factual edition.  Just the facts!

Friday, August 3, 2012

Republicans are fiscally irresponsible

The biggest myth about Republicans is that they are financially responsible.
Watch this video to find the truth.